AEM, OMQ and TSJ Ops clinch basketball, volleyball titles at JRD sports complexLady Meherbai Tata and the Jubilee Diamond: A legacy of sacrifice and philanthropyJharkhand braces for Monsoon exit as withdrawal advancesPalamu Tiger Reserve: Villagers voluntarily hand over 31 country-made gunsIndian-origin South African jurist Navi Pillay wins 2026 Nobel Peace PrizeAI must serve people, not replace human intelligence: IAS officer Sonal Goel at IIT (ISM) DhanbadPalamu BJP seeks early compensation for crop, house damage caused by monkeys, nilgais, elephantsTrailer overturns near Gandhi Ghat in Jamshedpur, no casualties

SC asks “Should we roll out red carpet?” while dismissing plea on missing Rohingyas

  New Delhi, Dec 2: The Supreme Court on Tuesday heard a petition related to Rohingya refugees before a bench led by…

SC asks “Should we roll out red carpet?” while dismissing plea on missing Rohingyas

 

New Delhi, Dec 2: The Supreme Court on Tuesday heard a petition related to Rohingya refugees before a bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant. The bench sharply criticised the petitioner over allegations that five Rohingyas had gone missing from police custody.

The bench made it clear that those who enter the country illegally cannot expect special treatment. The court also refused to issue a notice to the Centre. The next hearing is scheduled for December 16, when other related matters concerning Rohingyas will also be taken up.

Also Read- ED raids Ranchi CA Naresh Kejriwal in first-ever FEMA action in Jharkhand

During the proceedings, the bench adopted a firm stance, describing the individuals as infiltrators and stressing that the Northeast border is extremely sensitive.

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

The judges questioned whether the petitioner expected the court to “roll out a red carpet” for people who enter the country unlawfully.

The bench noted that demands for food, shelter, and education for such individuals could not be placed on the judiciary, adding that habeas corpus pleas in this context were unrealistic.

Advertisement
Advertisement

CJI Surya Kant remarked strongly that seeking a habeas corpus order in such matters is a “fancy argument” and reiterated that the individuals concerned are illegal migrants. Given the nation’s security concerns and border sensitivities, the bench said it could not extend sympathy to such petitions.

Also Read- Jharkhand Health Dept to launch intensive raids against nicotine pouches

The petition had alleged that five Rohingya refugees were missing from police custody and urged the court to order an inquiry to trace them. It also challenged their detention as illegal and inhumane, claiming they were being kept in degrading conditions.

The Centre has consistently maintained that Rohingyas are not Indian citizens and pose a threat to national security. In 2017 as well, the Supreme Court refused to halt their deportation. It is estimated that around 40,000 Rohingyas currently live across India, most of them without valid documents.

Advertisement
Advertisement
More from Breaking
AEM, OMQ and TSJ Ops clinch basketball, volleyball titles at JRD sports complex

AEM, OMQ and TSJ Ops clinch basketball, volleyball titles at JRD sports complex

October 10, 2026
Lady Meherbai Tata and the Jubilee Diamond: A legacy of sacrifice and philanthropy

Lady Meherbai Tata and the Jubilee Diamond: A legacy of sacrifice and philanthropy

October 10, 2026
Jharkhand braces for Monsoon exit as withdrawal advances

Jharkhand braces for Monsoon exit as withdrawal advances

October 10, 2026

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

About the Author

Suman Shrivastava