1.Explained: Why Jharkhand HC refused to modify order for probe against former Gumla SPs in missing minor case 2. Jharkhand: Brain malaria claims three children in East Singhbhum’s Potka and more storiesExplained: Why Jharkhand HC refused to modify order for probe against former Gumla SPs in missing minor caseJharkhand: Brain malaria claims three children in East Singhbhum’s PotkaJharkhand: Newborn dies after C-section at private hospital in Palamu, facility sealedPalamu Tiger Reserve team rescues highly venomous Russell’s viper from house in BareysarnJharkhand records 61% monsoon rainfall deficit, IMD forecasts advancement over next 3–4 daysJharkhand: 74 KGBA Vidyalaya girls fall sick in Garhwa, prompt medical response ensures full recoveryIIT (ISM) wraps up refresher course on 6G and optical communication

CJI says media misquoted his remarks; clarifies comments were against fake degree holders

New Delhi, May 16: Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant on Saturday clarified that his controversial oral remarks made during a…

CJI says media misquoted his remarks; clarifies comments were against fake degree holders

Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant

New Delhi, May 16: Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant on Saturday clarified that his controversial oral remarks made during a court hearing were directed only at individuals who entered professions using fake or bogus degrees, and not at the youth of the country, as reported by a section of the media.

The clarification came after his comments sparked widespread debate online, with several reports suggesting that the CJI had criticised unemployed youth and young activists.

CJI Says Remarks Were Misquoted

In a statement issued on Saturday, Justice Surya Kant said his observations had been “misquoted” and taken out of context.

“I am pained to read how a section of the media has misquoted my oral observations made during the hearing of a frivolous case yesterday. What I had specifically criticised were those who have entered professions like the Bar (legal profession) with the aid of fake and bogus degrees. Similar persons have sneaked into the media, social media, and other noble professions as well, and hence, they are like parasites,” the CJI said.

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

He further said that claims suggesting he had criticised the youth of India were “totally baseless.”

“It is totally baseless to suggest that I criticised the youth of our nation. Not only am I proud of our present and future human resource, but every youth of India inspires me. It is not an exaggeration to say that Indian youth have great regard and respect for me, and I too see them as the pillars of a developed India,” he added.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Remarks Made During Delhi High Court Hearing

The comments were made while the Supreme Court was hearing a petition filed by a lawyer seeking senior designation by the Delhi High Court.

Advertisement
Advertisement

During the hearing, the CJI reportedly questioned the genuineness of law degrees held by several advocates, particularly in Delhi, and said he was considering asking the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to verify such degrees.

He had also remarked that “parasites” were attacking institutions and referred to unemployed youngsters entering media, social media, and activism.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“There are youngsters like cockroaches, who don’t get any employment and don’t have any place in the profession. Some of them become media, some of them become social media, some of them become RTI activists, some of them become other activists, and they start attacking everyone,” the CJI had said during the hearing.

Controversy Over CJI’s Remarks

The remarks quickly went viral on social media, drawing criticism from several users who interpreted them as an attack on unemployed youth, activists, and media professionals. Following the backlash, the Chief Justice issued the clarification to explain the context of his comments.

 

 

More from Breaking
1.Explained: Why Jharkhand HC refused to modify order for probe against former Gumla SPs in missing minor case 2. Jharkhand: Brain malaria claims three children in East Singhbhum’s Potka and more stories

1.Explained: Why Jharkhand HC refused to modify order for probe against former Gumla SPs in missing minor case 2. Jharkhand: Brain malaria claims three children in East Singhbhum’s Potka and more stories

June 27, 2026
Explained: Why Jharkhand HC refused to modify order for probe against former Gumla SPs in missing minor case

Explained: Why Jharkhand HC refused to modify order for probe against former Gumla SPs in missing minor case

June 27, 2026
Jharkhand: Brain malaria claims three children in East Singhbhum’s Potka

Jharkhand: Brain malaria claims three children in East Singhbhum’s Potka

June 27, 2026

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

About the Author

Suman Shrivastava