SWAMI DIVYAGYAN
The election landscape in Jharkhand’s Latehar district, which includes the Latehar and Manika assembly constituencies, has become complex and intriguing this season. The Latehar seat is reserved for Scheduled Castes (SC), while Manika is reserved for Scheduled Tribes (ST). Here, caste equations, rebel candidates, and the face-off between two key parties — BJP and Congress — have added new dynamics to the contest.
Manika Seat: Congress and BJP Face Rebel Challenges
In Manika, there is a direct contest between Congress’s Ramchandra Singh and BJP’s Harikrishna Singh. Ramchandra Singh is a hardworking and grassroots leader known for his consistent engagement with the people. However, his path to victory has been complicated by a challenge from his former ally and Congress district president, Muneshwar Oraon, who has entered the race as an independent candidate. Muneshwar, who also ran independently in 2014, was responsible for splitting the Congress vote bank and contributed to the party’s defeat. His re-entry as an independent candidate could potentially divide Congress’s traditional voter base, putting Ramchandra Singh at a disadvantage.
Muneshwar Oraon holds considerable influence over the Oraon community in the region. As a former Congress district president, he enjoys a strong local presence and recognition. It is often observed that rebel candidates who have previously held significant party positions pose a considerable threat to official candidates. If Oraon successfully sways a portion of the Congress vote bank, Ramchandra Singh could find his path to victory challenging.
On the BJP side, Harikrishna Singh faces a similar dilemma. While the BJP-AJSU alliance strengthens Harikrishna’s base with an established grassroots network, his campaign has been disrupted by the candidacy of Raghupal Singh, a former BJP candidate who is now contesting on an SP ticket. Raghupal, a prominent figure among the influential Kharwar caste, contested on a BJP ticket in the previous election. This time, after failing to secure the BJP ticket, he initially sought a position in the RJD, and eventually entered the race on an SP ticket. His candidacy could fragment the BJP’s vote bank, creating a significant obstacle for Harikrishna Singh. Raghupal Singh’s defection also indicates his intention to leverage his caste-based influence to impact BJP’s electoral calculations.
Also Read- Jharkhand Polls: A crucial electoral battle for development and stability
Latehar Seat: Baijnath Ram vs. Prakash Ram in a Fierce Contest
The Latehar seat, reserved for Scheduled Castes (SC), has seen a longstanding rivalry between JMM’s Baijnath Ram and BJP’s Prakash Ram. Both candidates have a history of contesting elections against each other, with Baijnath winning three times and Prakash twice over the past five elections. This time, both candidates bring unique advantages and challenges that have intensified the competition.
Baijnath Ram: Ministerial Influence but Faces Anti-Incumbency
Baijnath Ram, the sitting MLA and a state minister, enjoys a substantial influence in the region, which has only strengthened since he took office. His ministerial role has expanded his reach, particularly among communities affected by the Kolvari displacement. Kolvari displacement is a sensitive issue in Latehar, where mining activities have displaced numerous residents from their ancestral land. Baijnath, a leading figure in the Kolvari Displacement Movement, has actively advocated for the displaced, solidifying his base among affected communities and enhancing his regional influence.
Despite his advantages, Baijnath Ram faces the challenge of anti-incumbency. His prolonged tenure in office has led to some dissatisfaction among constituents regarding his policies and governance. Opponents are likely to leverage this anti-incumbency sentiment, creating a potential obstacle for Baijnath’s re-election. His reliance on support from displaced communities may not be enough to offset broader public discontent.
Prakash Ram: BJP-AJSU Alliance Boost but Risks of Internal Sabotage
Prakash Ram, representing the BJP-AJSU alliance, has an interesting political trajectory. He has contested from various parties and held office multiple times, winning on an RJD ticket in 2005, then on a Jharkhand Vikas Morcha (JVM) ticket in 2014, and now as a BJP candidate. The BJP-AJSU alliance gives him a formidable advantage, bolstering his chances with a strong cadre and grassroots network. Analysts estimate that Prakash enjoys a personal support base of around 30,000 votes, combined with the BJP’s cadre votes. This support base makes him a serious contender against Baijnath Ram.
However, Prakash Ram’s political strategy is not without risks. Known for working with a select team, he has experienced instances of internal sabotage in previous elections. This year, too, his campaign could face resistance from within his party. Although he has the BJP’s organizational backing, internal discontent could undermine his position. His success will depend on how effectively he navigates these internal challenges and leverages the BJP-AJSU support to his advantage.
The Influence of Caste Equations and Regional Challenges
Caste dynamics play a significant role in both the Latehar and Manika assembly elections. In Latehar, the SC and OBC communities hold substantial influence, which could sway the election outcome. Both Baijnath Ram and Prakash Ram represent the dominant SC community and have maintained a balance in these caste dynamics over the years. Prakash also has some influence among OBC voters, giving him an edge with a broader voter base.
In Manika, the Kharwar and Oraon communities hold considerable influence, further complicating the election dynamics. Ramchandra Singh of Congress risks losing Oraon votes to Muneshwar Oraon, while Harikrishna Singh of BJP could see the Kharwar vote divided due to Raghupal Singh’s SP candidacy. These caste divisions pose significant challenges to both BJP and Congress, as well as provide opportunities for smaller parties and independent candidates to gain traction.
Electoral History and Potential for Breaking Patterns
The electoral history of Latehar is noteworthy, with only one candidate, Hari Darshan Ram, managing to win two consecutive terms in the 1980 and 1985 elections. This legacy poses an additional challenge for Baijnath Ram, as he seeks to achieve consecutive victories in a constituency where this has been rare. Prakash Ram, an experienced politician who has switched parties multiple times, brings strategic acumen and a strong local network, making him a formidable opponent.
Also Read- Battle for tribal identity, power in Santhal Pargana; BJP-JMM in a fierce contest
Election Landscape: Opportunities and Challenges for Both Sides
In summary, the 2024 assembly elections in Latehar and Manika are characterized by caste equations, regional issues, and strategic calculations that are likely to shape the outcomes. Baijnath Ram is banking on his ministerial influence and support from the displaced community, while Prakash Ram is leveraging the BJP-AJSU alliance and his broader voter base to make a strong showing. Both candidates face significant challenges, with anti-incumbency and internal resistance likely to play a decisive role in determining the winner.
Similarly, in Manika, the presence of rebel candidates has added complexity to the race. Ramchandra Singh and Harikrishna Singh face challenges from former allies and party members who have now become competitors. The rebel candidates’ influence, particularly among specific caste groups, could significantly alter vote shares and sway the final outcome.
Conclusion
The Latehar and Manika elections are expected to be influenced heavily by caste dynamics, regional issues, and the impact of rebel candidates. In both constituencies, election outcomes will be determined not only by party support but also by individual influence, caste alignment, and grassroots popularity. Ultimately, it will be interesting to see who the voters choose as their representative, as these elections hold the potential to reshape old alliances and create new political equations.
