• Latest
Supreme Court

SC bans bulldozer actions, says Executive cannot substitute Judiciary

13 November 2024
Seven UMU pharmacy students chosen for ‘Scholarship for Daughters’ programme

Seven UMU pharmacy students chosen for ‘Scholarship for Daughters’ programme

11 March 2026
News diary

1. Jharkhand assembly: Opp flags empty hospitals, govt promises new medical colleges, RIMS-2 2. Jharkhand HC sends ED officers’ case to CBI, questions Ranchi police action and more stories

11 March 2026
Babulal Marandi slams Hemant govt as ‘deceptive’, demands change in Jharkhand

Jharkhand assembly: Opp flags empty hospitals, govt promises new medical colleges, RIMS-2

11 March 2026
Jharkhand HC

Delay in trial not ground for bail in NIA cases, says Jharkhand High Court

11 March 2026
From Jharkhand, ZKTOR experiments with surveillance-free social media

From Jharkhand, ZKTOR experiments with surveillance-free social media

11 March 2026
Jharkhand News: Over 8,000 UG students of NPU skip final semester exams

NP University engages PG toppers, gold medalists as teaching assistants

11 March 2026
The Jharkhand Story
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Advertise with us
  • About Editor
  • About Us
  • Contact
Thursday, March 12, 2026
  • Home
  • Election
  • Politics
  • Judiciary
  • Governance
  • Crime
  • Industries & Mining
  • Health
  • Tribal Issues
  • Education
  • Sports
  • More
    • Life Style
    • Jobs & Careers
    • Tourism
    • Opinion
    • Development Story
    • Science & Tech
    • Climate & Wildlife
    • Corruption
    • News Diary
No Result
View All Result
The Jharkhand Story
No Result
View All Result
Home Breaking

SC bans bulldozer actions, says Executive cannot substitute Judiciary

Jharkhand Story by Jharkhand Story
13 November 2024
in Breaking, Judiciary
Supreme Court
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK

 

New Delhi, Nov 13: The Supreme Court on Wednesday, imposed a ban on bulldozer actions across the country. In its ruling, the court stated that no one’s house can be demolished solely because they are an accused or convicted in a criminal case.

The court emphasized that justice cannot be served through bulldozers in a system governed by law. A bench led by Justice B.R. Gavai said that authorities cannot carry out bulldozer actions by disregarding the law.

The Supreme Court said that the executive cannot act as a judge, declare someone guilty, and demolish their house.

The court highlighted the definition of powers between the executive and the judiciary. The Supreme Court further stated that properties cannot be demolished without following legal procedures.

“If the Executive, in an arbitrary manner, demolishes the house of a citizen only on the ground that they are accused of a crime, then it acts contrary to the principles of rule of law,” a bench of Justices B R Gavai and K V Viswanathan said.

Also Read- PM Modi lays foundation stone for AIIMS Darbhanga, launches multi-crore projects in Bihar

SC says authorities carried out bulldozer actions ignoring the law

The court raised the question of whether the state government can perform judicial functions, stating that the state cannot replace the judiciary. If the state demolishes properties, it would be a clear case of injustice.

The Supreme Court firmly stated that properties cannot be demolished without following legal procedures. The bench said that in several cases of bulldozer actions brought before the Supreme court, it is evident that authorities carried out such actions by disregarding the law.

Notably, petitions were filed against bulldozer actions in several states, with Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind also being one of the petitioners.

Even if a person is proven guilty, demolishing their house is wrong: SC

The Supreme Court issued guidelines, stating that it would be wrong to demolish a person’s house even after they are proven guilty of a crime. Such an action by government officials would be illegal, as the executive would be taking the law into its own hands.

The court emphasized that owning a home is a fundamental right for everyone. Additionally, the court stated that no one’s house can be demolished unless they are given a notice at least 15 days in advance.

Notice must explain why the property is illegal: SC

The Supreme Court further said that if action is to be taken on any property, it is mandatory for the authorities to send a notice to the property owner via registered post at least 15 days in advance.

The notice will be affixed outside the house, detailing why the property is considered illegal, which rules have been violated, and the reasons for its demolition.

The administration must also ensure that the entire demolition process is videotaped. Any violation of these guidelines will be considered contempt of court.

Also Read- Jharkhand Weather: Minimum temp drops to 16° Celsius in Ranchi

Tags: bulldozer actionsExecutiveJudiciarySupreme Court of India
ShareTweetShareSendSendShare
Next Post
Jharkhand Polls: 46.25% voter turnout till 1 pm in first phase

Jharkhand Polls: 46.25% voter turnout till 1 pm in first phase

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Advertise with us
  • About Editor
  • About Us
  • Contact
Mail us : thejharkhandstory@gmail.com

© 2025 The Jharkhand Story

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Election
  • Politics
  • Judiciary
  • Governance
  • Crime
  • Industries & Mining
  • Health
  • Tribal Issues
  • Education
  • Sports
  • More
    • Life Style
    • Jobs & Careers
    • Tourism
    • Opinion
    • Development Story
    • Science & Tech
    • Climate & Wildlife
    • Corruption
    • News Diary