DD bar murder case: BJP leader to be brought to JamshedpurCM Hemant Soren pushes eco-tourism, sports university in JharkhandJharkhand CM orders modernisation of Ranchi’s Tikait Umrao Singh shooting rangeJharkhand SIR drive yet to match Maiyya Samman Yojana’s public response in PalamuJharkhand Weather: IMD issues heavy rain alert for Ranchi, Dhanbad, Hazaribagh and 10 other districts1. Jamshedpur Nightclub Murder: Bistupur SHO suspended, DD Club sealed 2. Jharkhand HC orders SAIL to give compassionate job after 14-year legal battle and more storiesJamshedpur Nightclub Murder: Bistupur SHO suspended, DD Club sealedJharkhand HC orders SAIL to give compassionate job after 14-year legal battle

Centre opposes petitions for retrospective refund of mineral royalties to states, SC reserves order

THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK   New Delhi, July 31: The Supreme Court on Wednesday reserved its ruling on whether the royalty charged…

Centre opposes petitions for retrospective refund of mineral royalties to states, SC reserves order

THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK

 

New Delhi, July 31: The Supreme Court on Wednesday reserved its ruling on whether the royalty charged by the Centre on mines and mineral-bearing lands since 1989 should be refunded to the states.

Notably on July 25, in a landmark judgment, a nine-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court said in an 8:1 majority decision that states have legislative authority to impose taxes on mines and mineral-rich land, and the royalty paid on minerals is not a tax.

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

A nine-judge Constitution bench, led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, reserved its judgment after hearing arguments from the Centre, states, and mining companies on its July 25 ruling.

The bench also comprised Justices Hrishikesh Roy, Abhay S Oka, JB Pardiwala, Manoj Misra, Ujjal Bhuyan, Satish Chandra Sharma and Augustine George Masih.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Also Read- Santosh Kumar Gangwar takes oath as Governor of Jharkhand

Centre opposes petition of states

During the hearing, the central government opposed the petition in the Supreme Court where mineral-rich states requested a refund of royalties imposed by it on minerals and mineral-rich land since 1989.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The centre argued that any order directing it to refund royalties to the states with retrospective effect would have multifaceted implications.

Debate arises over retrospective application of SC verdict

This decision by the Supreme Court is expected to lead to a significant increase in revenue for mineral-rich states. However, it has sparked another controversy regarding the implementation of the ruling.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Some mineral-rich states governed by opposition parties have requested the Supreme Court to apply this decision retrospectively so that they can seek a refund of royalties from the centre.

The centre has opposed any such order, arguing that it would have multifaceted implications. Mining companies have also supported the centre’s stance on not refunding royalties to the mineral-rich states.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the centre, stated that states like Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan, which are governed by the Bharatiya Janata Party, want the decision to be implemented with prospective effect.

Also Read- Jharkhand News: Kolhan bandh to protest tribal land acquisition evokes strong response

More from Breaking
DD bar murder case: BJP leader to be brought to Jamshedpur

DD bar murder case: BJP leader to be brought to Jamshedpur

July 6, 2026
CM Hemant Soren pushes eco-tourism, sports university in Jharkhand

CM Hemant Soren pushes eco-tourism, sports university in Jharkhand

July 6, 2026
Jharkhand CM orders modernisation of Ranchi’s Tikait Umrao Singh shooting range

Jharkhand CM orders modernisation of Ranchi’s Tikait Umrao Singh shooting range

July 6, 2026

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

About the Author

Suman Shrivastava