• Latest
Supreme Court

Centre opposes petitions for retrospective refund of mineral royalties to states, SC reserves order

31 July 2024
JMM raises SIR concerns, seeks online access to 2003 voter rolls, clarity on verification process

JMM urges EC to allow document submission during SIR enumeration in Jharkhand

15 June 2026
News diary

1. Jharkhand cabinet approves multiple mining leases, clears Emerald block reservation 2. Jharkhand CM launches statewide anti-drug awareness campaign, flags off publicity vehicle and more stories

15 June 2026
Jamshedpur intensifies drive against traffic congestion

Jamshedpur intensifies drive against traffic congestion

15 June 2026
Jharkhand cabinet approves multiple mining leases, clears Emerald block reservation

Jharkhand cabinet approves multiple mining leases, clears Emerald block reservation

15 June 2026
Jharkhand CM launches statewide anti-drug awareness campaign, flags off publicity vehicles

Jharkhand CM launches statewide anti-drug awareness campaign, flags off publicity vehicles

15 June 2026
Jharkhand CM launches ‘district sandbox’ to accelerate health-tech innovation, AI-driven healthcare

Jharkhand CM launches ‘district sandbox’ to accelerate health-tech innovation, AI-driven healthcare

15 June 2026
The Jharkhand Story
  • Breaking News!
  • Advertise with us
  • Governance
  • Fashion
  • Education
  • Tribal Crafts
  • Judiciary
  • Careers
  • Politics
  • Climate Updates
  • Crime
  • Industries & Mining
Tuesday, June 16, 2026
No Result
View All Result
The Jharkhand Story
No Result
View All Result
Home Breaking

Centre opposes petitions for retrospective refund of mineral royalties to states, SC reserves order

Jharkhand Story by Jharkhand Story
31 July 2024
in Breaking, Governance, Judiciary
Supreme Court
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK

 

New Delhi, July 31: The Supreme Court on Wednesday reserved its ruling on whether the royalty charged by the Centre on mines and mineral-bearing lands since 1989 should be refunded to the states.

Notably on July 25, in a landmark judgment, a nine-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court said in an 8:1 majority decision that states have legislative authority to impose taxes on mines and mineral-rich land, and the royalty paid on minerals is not a tax.

A nine-judge Constitution bench, led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, reserved its judgment after hearing arguments from the Centre, states, and mining companies on its July 25 ruling.

The bench also comprised Justices Hrishikesh Roy, Abhay S Oka, JB Pardiwala, Manoj Misra, Ujjal Bhuyan, Satish Chandra Sharma and Augustine George Masih.

Also Read- Santosh Kumar Gangwar takes oath as Governor of Jharkhand

Centre opposes petition of states

During the hearing, the central government opposed the petition in the Supreme Court where mineral-rich states requested a refund of royalties imposed by it on minerals and mineral-rich land since 1989.

The centre argued that any order directing it to refund royalties to the states with retrospective effect would have multifaceted implications.

Debate arises over retrospective application of SC verdict

This decision by the Supreme Court is expected to lead to a significant increase in revenue for mineral-rich states. However, it has sparked another controversy regarding the implementation of the ruling.

Some mineral-rich states governed by opposition parties have requested the Supreme Court to apply this decision retrospectively so that they can seek a refund of royalties from the centre.

The centre has opposed any such order, arguing that it would have multifaceted implications. Mining companies have also supported the centre’s stance on not refunding royalties to the mineral-rich states.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the centre, stated that states like Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan, which are governed by the Bharatiya Janata Party, want the decision to be implemented with prospective effect.

Also Read- Jharkhand News: Kolhan bandh to protest tribal land acquisition evokes strong response

Tags: Central Governmentmineral royaltiesstatesSupreme Court of India
ShareTweetShareSendSendShare
Next Post
Charanjit Channi moves privilege notice against PM Modi over Anurag Thakur’s remarks

Charanjit Channi moves privilege notice against PM Modi over Anurag Thakur's remarks

  • About Editor
  • About Us
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap
  • Terms & Conditions
  • The jharkhand Story
Mail us : thejharkhandstory@gmail.com

© 2025 The Jharkhand Story

No Result
View All Result
  • About Editor
  • About Us
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap
  • Terms & Conditions
  • The jharkhand Story