Advertisement
Advertisement
Jharkhand
Wednesday
June 17, 2026
The Jharkhand Story

Independent journalism from the heart of Jharkhand

Breaking Jharkhand High Court designates 10 advocates as senior advocates  ·  RSS demands probe into Ranchi office attack  ·  Jharkhand transfers 88 administrative service officers in major bureaucratic reshuffle  ·  Tata Zoo’s iconic lioness Zoya dies at 16 after prolonged illness  ·  Jharkhand HC again pulls up State, rejects delayed appeals over administrative lethargy  ·  BJP terms attack on RSS office in Ranchi ‘cowardly and unfortunate’, demands arrest of culprits

SC bars new FIRs against Udhayanidhi Stalin over remarks on Sanatan Dharma

THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK   Advertisement New Delhi, March 6: The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that no new FIR should be…

SC bars new FIRs against Udhayanidhi Stalin over remarks on Sanatan Dharma

THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK

 

Advertisement
Advertisement

New Delhi, March 6: The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that no new FIR should be filed against Tamil Nadu Deputy Chief Minister M. Udhayanidhi Stalin without its permission, following his controversial remarks in 2023 about “eradicating Sanatan Dharma.”

A bench Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar also extended an interim order exempting Stalin from personal appearance in court regarding existing FIRs.

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Stalin’s legal team sought to club the FIRs and transfer them to Tamil Nadu, where the alleged incident occurred, arguing that multiple cases arising from the same incident in different states were unfair.

Also Read- Jharkhand Weather: Max. Temp. to rise by 3-4°C in next 72 hours

Senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi cited precedents like the Nupur Sharma case, where the Supreme Court transferred all related FIRs to the location of the first registered complaint.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing Maharashtra, argued that Stalin’s remarks, comparing Sanatan Dharma to diseases like malaria and dengue, were highly offensive and would not be tolerated if directed at other religions.

The court focused on whether the FIRs should be transferred to a single location and did not delve into the merits of the case. The matter is scheduled for further hearing on April 28.

In a conference held in September 2023, Stalin reportedly remarked that Sanatan Dharma was contrary to social justice and equality, advocating for its “eradication” and comparing it to diseases like coronavirus, malaria, and dengue, calling for it to be “destroyed.”

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Also Read- PM Modi advocates for year-round tourism in Uttarakhand to boost economy, employment

More from Breaking
Jharkhand High Court designates 10 advocates as senior advocates

Jharkhand High Court designates 10 advocates as senior advocates

June 17, 2026
RSS demands probe into Ranchi office attack

RSS demands probe into Ranchi office attack

June 17, 2026
Jharkhand transfers 88 administrative service officers in major bureaucratic reshuffle

Jharkhand transfers 88 administrative service officers in major bureaucratic reshuffle

June 17, 2026

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.