Sona Devi University to hold induction-cum-orientation programme for freshers on August 13Jamshedpur FC to exit ISL from 2026-27 season, vows to focus on grassroots footballJharkhand ends July with 26% rainfall deficit despite strong monsoon recoveryPalamu minor girl harassment case: Nine accused arrested; hunt on for 10 othersTatanagar station redevelopment gets fresh push, advisory panel reviews passenger facilitiesJharkhand: Expired salt meant for poor found dumped in Seraikela warehouseJharkhand HC imposes ₹12 lakh cost on litigant for suppressing material facts in Ranchi land casePolice detain three Ranchi residents during raid at Jamshedpur hotel

SC bars new FIRs against Udhayanidhi Stalin over remarks on Sanatan Dharma

THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK   Advertisement New Delhi, March 6: The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that no new FIR should be…

SC bars new FIRs against Udhayanidhi Stalin over remarks on Sanatan Dharma

THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK

 

Advertisement
Advertisement

New Delhi, March 6: The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that no new FIR should be filed against Tamil Nadu Deputy Chief Minister M. Udhayanidhi Stalin without its permission, following his controversial remarks in 2023 about “eradicating Sanatan Dharma.”

A bench Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar also extended an interim order exempting Stalin from personal appearance in court regarding existing FIRs.

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Stalin’s legal team sought to club the FIRs and transfer them to Tamil Nadu, where the alleged incident occurred, arguing that multiple cases arising from the same incident in different states were unfair.

Also Read- Jharkhand Weather: Max. Temp. to rise by 3-4°C in next 72 hours

Senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi cited precedents like the Nupur Sharma case, where the Supreme Court transferred all related FIRs to the location of the first registered complaint.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing Maharashtra, argued that Stalin’s remarks, comparing Sanatan Dharma to diseases like malaria and dengue, were highly offensive and would not be tolerated if directed at other religions.

The court focused on whether the FIRs should be transferred to a single location and did not delve into the merits of the case. The matter is scheduled for further hearing on April 28.

In a conference held in September 2023, Stalin reportedly remarked that Sanatan Dharma was contrary to social justice and equality, advocating for its “eradication” and comparing it to diseases like coronavirus, malaria, and dengue, calling for it to be “destroyed.”

Advertisement
Advertisement

Also Read- PM Modi advocates for year-round tourism in Uttarakhand to boost economy, employment

More from Breaking
Sona Devi University to hold induction-cum-orientation programme for freshers on August 13

Sona Devi University to hold induction-cum-orientation programme for freshers on August 13

August 1, 2026
Jamshedpur FC to exit ISL from 2026-27 season, vows to focus on grassroots football

Jamshedpur FC to exit ISL from 2026-27 season, vows to focus on grassroots football

August 1, 2026
Jharkhand ends July with 26% rainfall deficit despite strong monsoon recovery

Jharkhand ends July with 26% rainfall deficit despite strong monsoon recovery

August 1, 2026

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

About the Author

Suman Shrivastava