Why Chhath Puja is the soul of Bharat and how it boosts Bihar’s economyIPS Association backs DGP Tadasha Mishra, condemns Babulal Marandi’s remarks; BJP hits backCM Hemant Soren pays tribute to Birsa Munda on 151st birth anniversary at Ranchi memorialJharkhand marks 26th Foundation Day with ‘Run for Cleanliness’ across all 24 districtsShakti Sadan for women in distress becomes operational in DaltonganjJharkhand: Neither jail, police station nor MLA’s residence is safe; where is the rule of law? asks Babulal MarandiTeachers take centre stage at Loyola School, Telco, for lively Children’s Day celebrationDrones, CCTV and special patrols to secure Chhath ghats in Jamshedpur

SC bars new FIRs against Udhayanidhi Stalin over remarks on Sanatan Dharma

THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK   Advertisement Advertisement New Delhi, March 6: The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that no new FIR should…

SC bars new FIRs against Udhayanidhi Stalin over remarks on Sanatan Dharma

THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK

 

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

New Delhi, March 6: The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that no new FIR should be filed against Tamil Nadu Deputy Chief Minister M. Udhayanidhi Stalin without its permission, following his controversial remarks in 2023 about “eradicating Sanatan Dharma.”

A bench Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar also extended an interim order exempting Stalin from personal appearance in court regarding existing FIRs.

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Stalin’s legal team sought to club the FIRs and transfer them to Tamil Nadu, where the alleged incident occurred, arguing that multiple cases arising from the same incident in different states were unfair.

Also Read- Jharkhand Weather: Max. Temp. to rise by 3-4°C in next 72 hours

Senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi cited precedents like the Nupur Sharma case, where the Supreme Court transferred all related FIRs to the location of the first registered complaint.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing Maharashtra, argued that Stalin’s remarks, comparing Sanatan Dharma to diseases like malaria and dengue, were highly offensive and would not be tolerated if directed at other religions.

The court focused on whether the FIRs should be transferred to a single location and did not delve into the merits of the case. The matter is scheduled for further hearing on April 28.

In a conference held in September 2023, Stalin reportedly remarked that Sanatan Dharma was contrary to social justice and equality, advocating for its “eradication” and comparing it to diseases like coronavirus, malaria, and dengue, calling for it to be “destroyed.”

Advertisement
Advertisement

Also Read- PM Modi advocates for year-round tourism in Uttarakhand to boost economy, employment

More from Breaking
Why Chhath Puja is the soul of Bharat and how it boosts Bihar’s economy

Why Chhath Puja is the soul of Bharat and how it boosts Bihar’s economy

November 15, 2026
IPS Association backs DGP Tadasha Mishra, condemns Babulal Marandi’s remarks; BJP hits back

IPS Association backs DGP Tadasha Mishra, condemns Babulal Marandi’s remarks; BJP hits back

November 15, 2026
CM Hemant Soren pays tribute to Birsa Munda on 151st birth anniversary at Ranchi memorial

CM Hemant Soren pays tribute to Birsa Munda on 151st birth anniversary at Ranchi memorial

November 15, 2026

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

About the Author

Suman Shrivastava