1. Jairam Mahto-Police row: Is the abuse debate hiding the extortion question? 2. August 26: The day Tata Steel’s historic journey began and more storiesJairam Mahto-Police row: Is the abuse debate hiding the extortion question?Ursuline Convent hosts eye donation drive in Ranchi, experts bust mythsBabulal Marandi seeks Prashant Kumar’s removal from JSSC reform panel, demands independent probeAugust 26: The day Tata Steel’s historic journey beganDengue under control in Jamshedpur as Tata Steel UISL steps up vigilancePTR resettlers to get raiyati rights as Jharkhand cabinet approves land conversionSir Dorabji Tata: The man who built a nation before it was born

Land-for-jobs scam: Ex-Bihar CM Rabri Devi, her two daughters granted interim bail

THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK   Advertisement New Delhi, Feb 9: Former Bihar Chief Minister Rabri Devi, her daughters Misa Bharti and Hema…

Land-for-jobs scam: Ex-Bihar CM Rabri Devi, her two daughters granted interim bail

Image: Organiser

THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK

 

Advertisement
Advertisement

New Delhi, Feb 9: Former Bihar Chief Minister Rabri Devi, her daughters Misa Bharti and Hema Yadav, and other accused in the Land-for-Jobs money laundering case were all granted interim bail till February 28 by Delhi’s Rouse Avenue court on Friday.

The court summoned them upon reviewing the charge sheet filed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED).

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Special Judge Vishal Gogne provided interim bail to Rabri Devi, her daughters, and Hridyanand Chaudhary upon posting a bail bond of Rs one lakh and a surety bond of equal value.

The next scheduled hearing for bail consideration is on February 28, 2024.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Also Read- Uttarakhand: Haldwani violence leaves four dead, over 100 police personnel injured

Special public prosecutor Manish Jain, representing the ED, requested additional time to submit the reply. He proposed that interim relief be granted until the reply is submitted.

Senior advocate Maninder Singh, the accused’s counsel, contended that since they weren’t arrested during the investigation, they should be granted bail in light of the Supreme Court’s ruling.

In the course of the proceedings, the court questioned the ED about its requirement for the custody of the accused, considering they had not been arrested during the agency’s investigation.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The court also noted that although the accused were not arrested during the investigation, a formal response might still be necessary.

Also Read- Jharkhand Weather: State likely to witness an extended winter 

More from Breaking
1. Jairam Mahto-Police row: Is the abuse debate hiding the extortion question? 2. August 26: The day Tata Steel’s historic journey began and more stories

1. Jairam Mahto-Police row: Is the abuse debate hiding the extortion question? 2. August 26: The day Tata Steel’s historic journey began and more stories

August 26, 2026
Jairam Mahto-Police row: Is the abuse debate hiding the extortion question?

Jairam Mahto-Police row: Is the abuse debate hiding the extortion question?

August 26, 2026
Ursuline Convent hosts eye donation drive in Ranchi, experts bust myths

Ursuline Convent hosts eye donation drive in Ranchi, experts bust myths

August 26, 2026

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

About the Author

Suman Shrivastava