1. Jamshedpur Trade Mark case: Supreme Court refers civil judge jurisdiction row to larger bench 2. Three new judges take oath at Jharkhand High Court, judge strength rises to 16Illegal gambling, lottery racket busted in Jamshedpur; 4 arrestedJamshedpur Trade Mark case: Supreme Court refers civil judge jurisdiction row to larger benchPalamu Admin to launch anti-encroachment drive on 5.74 acres at KinniBJP puts tribal leader Gajendra Singh Patel in charge of JharkhandJharkhand braces for intense rain as deep depression moves inlandTragedy strikes tribal family on Karma puja as woman found dead in LateharSix children drown in Palamu after Karma puja immersion rituals

SC pulls up Rahul Gandhi over China land remark, grants relief

THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK   Advertisement New Delhi, August 4: The Supreme Court on Monday delivered a sharp reprimand to Congress leader…

SC pulls up Rahul Gandhi over China land remark, grants relief

File Photo

THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK

 

Advertisement
Advertisement

New Delhi, August 4: The Supreme Court on Monday delivered a sharp reprimand to Congress leader Rahul Gandhi over his controversial statement alleging that China had seized 2,000 square kilometers of Indian territory.

The bench remarked that a “true Indian” would not say it, particularly from someone holding the position of Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha.

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Despite its criticism, the court granted Gandhi interim relief by staying the defamation proceedings initiated against him in connection with the remark.

Also Read- Three-day state mourning in Jharkhand after Shibu Soren’s demise

A bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and Augustine George Masih posed a pointed question during the hearing: “How did you know about 2,000 km being annexed by the Chinese? Why would you say these things? Why will you not ask these questions in Parliament?”

Advertisement
Advertisement

Gandhi’s statement originated during his 2022 Bharat Jodo Yatra, where he claimed a retired Army officer had told him about China occupying Indian land.

The defamation complaint, however, accuses him of making derogatory comments about the Army amid the border standoff.

The petitioner, Udai Shanker Srivastava, a former Director of the Border Roads Organisation, alleged that Gandhi’s remarks tarnished the image of the armed forces.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Also Read- Thunderstorm and lightning forecast across Jharkhand till August 7

Prior to approaching the Supreme Court, Gandhi had challenged the criminal complaint and the summoning order in the Allahabad High Court, calling the case politically motivated and malicious. His plea was rejected by the High Court on May 29, prompting him to seek relief from the apex court.

More from Breaking
1. Jamshedpur Trade Mark case: Supreme Court refers civil judge jurisdiction row to larger bench 2. Three new judges take oath at Jharkhand High Court, judge strength rises to 16

1. Jamshedpur Trade Mark case: Supreme Court refers civil judge jurisdiction row to larger bench 2. Three new judges take oath at Jharkhand High Court, judge strength rises to 16

September 23, 2026
Illegal gambling, lottery racket busted in Jamshedpur; 4 arrested

Illegal gambling, lottery racket busted in Jamshedpur; 4 arrested

September 23, 2026
Jamshedpur Trade Mark case: Supreme Court refers civil judge jurisdiction row to larger bench

Jamshedpur Trade Mark case: Supreme Court refers civil judge jurisdiction row to larger bench

September 23, 2026

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

About the Author

Suman Shrivastava