Palamu administration clears VUP for Ravan dahan in DaltonganjNilgai calf rescued in Medininagar, released into Palamu Tiger ReserveCM Hemant Soren inspects under-construction Kasmar–Barlanga road, reviews progress and qualityCM Hemant Soren immerses late mother Rupi Soren’s ashes at Rajrappa SangamElephant herd blocks Howrah–Mumbai main line, four Express trains strandedJharkhand Weather: Foggy mornings, clear skies and dry conditions likely for five daysPalamu Tiger Reserve recovers snares, arrows in anti-poaching patrol ahead of DussehraBokaro Steel Plant Blockade: Jharkhand HC acts during Puja holidays, all 11 gates reopened

SC rejects Justice Yashwant Varma’s challenge to inquiry report

THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK   Advertisement New Delhi, August 7: The Supreme Court on Thursday dismissed a petition filed by Justice Yashwant…

SC rejects Justice Yashwant Varma’s challenge to inquiry report

THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK

 

Advertisement
Advertisement

New Delhi, August 7: The Supreme Court on Thursday dismissed a petition filed by Justice Yashwant Varma of the Allahabad High Court, who sought to challenge the findings of a three-judge in-house committee and the recommendation made by former Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna to initiate impeachment proceedings against him.

The bench, comprising Justices Dipankar Datta and Augustine George Masih, refused to entertain Justice Varma’s argument that he had not been granted a fair opportunity to respond before the committee finalized its report.

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Also Read- ED raids multiple Jharkhand cities in ₹750 crore GST scam case

The matter stems from a March 14 incident in which bundles of cash were reportedly discovered by firefighters responding to a blaze at Justice Varma’s Delhi residence. At the time, he was serving as a judge of the Delhi High Court and was not present at home when the fire broke out.

During the hearing on July 28, the apex court posed sharp questions to Justice Varma’s counsel, Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal. The judges questioned why Justice Varma chose to appear before the in-house committee if he believed the process itself was unconstitutional, and why he was raising objections only after the inquiry had concluded.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Also Read- Jharkhand Weather Alert: Thunderstorms and heavy rain ahead

Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju had confirmed that a motion seeking Justice Varma’s removal will be tabled in the Lok Sabha first, in accordance with parliamentary procedures. He emphasized that such a step should reflect a consensus decision.

Advertisement
Advertisement
More from Breaking
Palamu administration clears VUP for Ravan dahan in Daltonganj

Palamu administration clears VUP for Ravan dahan in Daltonganj

October 21, 2026
Nilgai calf rescued in Medininagar, released into Palamu Tiger Reserve

Nilgai calf rescued in Medininagar, released into Palamu Tiger Reserve

October 21, 2026
CM Hemant Soren inspects under-construction Kasmar–Barlanga road, reviews progress and quality

CM Hemant Soren inspects under-construction Kasmar–Barlanga road, reviews progress and quality

October 20, 2026

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

About the Author

Suman Shrivastava