IIT (ISM) Dhanbad signs MoU with Urja Mobility for clean-tech researchLoyola School Telco students showcase confidence in choral dramatisation competitionबरी होने के बावजूद हिरासत में महिला: झारखंड HC ने पूछा- किस कानून के तहत रखा, गृह सचिव को तलब कियाAcquitted Yet Detained: Jharkhand HC questions woman’s continued custody, summons Home SecretaryKhunti DLSA holds legal, Aadhaar and medical camp for senior citizensMan dies after colliding with road roller in MahuadnarJharkhand DGP reviews Jamshedpur crime, directs swift arrests in bank robbery, firing casesWildlife Week 2026: Jamshedpur to host Nature Rally on October 2

Supreme Court refuses to stay trial against Lalu Yadav in land-for-jobs case

THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK   New Delhi, July 18: The Supreme Court has refused to stay the trial against former Bihar Chief…

Supreme Court refuses to stay trial against Lalu Yadav in land-for-jobs case

THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK

 

New Delhi, July 18: The Supreme Court has refused to stay the trial against former Bihar Chief Minister Lalu Prasad Yadav in the land-for-jobs case.

A bench comprising Justices M.M. Sundresh and N. Kotiswar Singh declined to intervene after hearing a petition filed on behalf of Lalu Prasad.

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Also Read- ED arrests ex-Chhattisgarh CM’s son in liquor scam

Earlier, Lalu had approached the Delhi High Court seeking to halt the trial, but the request was denied. He then appealed to the Supreme Court against the High Court’s order.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal appeared for Lalu Prasad in the apex court and argued that the CBI had registered the FIR in 2021, even though Lalu served as a minister between 2005 and 2009.

Advertisement
Advertisement

He contended that under legal provisions, the trial cannot proceed without prior sanction from the competent authority, which, he claimed, was not obtained.

Also Read- Jharkhand sees surplus rainfall; heavy showers forecast for Ranchi region

However, Additional Solicitor General S.V. Raju, appearing for the government, argued that the requirement for prior sanction was introduced through amendments to the Prevention of Corruption Act in 2018. Since the alleged offences occurred before that, the amendment would not apply, and no such sanction is needed in this case.

The court accepted the government’s argument and allowed the trial to continue.

Advertisement
Advertisement
More from Breaking
IIT (ISM) Dhanbad signs MoU with Urja Mobility for clean-tech research

IIT (ISM) Dhanbad signs MoU with Urja Mobility for clean-tech research

October 1, 2026
Loyola School Telco students showcase confidence in choral dramatisation competition

Loyola School Telco students showcase confidence in choral dramatisation competition

October 1, 2026
बरी होने के बावजूद हिरासत में महिला: झारखंड HC ने पूछा- किस कानून के तहत रखा, गृह सचिव को तलब किया

बरी होने के बावजूद हिरासत में महिला: झारखंड HC ने पूछा- किस कानून के तहत रखा, गृह सचिव को तलब किया

October 1, 2026

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

About the Author

Suman Shrivastava