Advertisement
Advertisement
Jharkhand
Thursday
June 18, 2026
The Jharkhand Story

Independent journalism from the heart of Jharkhand

Breaking Jharkhand High Court designates 10 advocates as senior advocates  ·  RSS demands probe into Ranchi office attack  ·  Jharkhand transfers 88 administrative service officers in major bureaucratic reshuffle  ·  Tata Zoo’s iconic lioness Zoya dies at 16 after prolonged illness  ·  Jharkhand HC again pulls up State, rejects delayed appeals over administrative lethargy  ·  BJP terms attack on RSS office in Ranchi ‘cowardly and unfortunate’, demands arrest of culprits

Supreme Court refuses to stay trial against Lalu Yadav in land-for-jobs case

THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK   Advertisement New Delhi, July 18: The Supreme Court has refused to stay the trial against former Bihar…

Supreme Court refuses to stay trial against Lalu Yadav in land-for-jobs case

THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK

 

Advertisement
Advertisement

New Delhi, July 18: The Supreme Court has refused to stay the trial against former Bihar Chief Minister Lalu Prasad Yadav in the land-for-jobs case.

A bench comprising Justices M.M. Sundresh and N. Kotiswar Singh declined to intervene after hearing a petition filed on behalf of Lalu Prasad.

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Also Read- ED arrests ex-Chhattisgarh CM’s son in liquor scam

Earlier, Lalu had approached the Delhi High Court seeking to halt the trial, but the request was denied. He then appealed to the Supreme Court against the High Court’s order.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal appeared for Lalu Prasad in the apex court and argued that the CBI had registered the FIR in 2021, even though Lalu served as a minister between 2005 and 2009.

He contended that under legal provisions, the trial cannot proceed without prior sanction from the competent authority, which, he claimed, was not obtained.

Also Read- Jharkhand sees surplus rainfall; heavy showers forecast for Ranchi region

However, Additional Solicitor General S.V. Raju, appearing for the government, argued that the requirement for prior sanction was introduced through amendments to the Prevention of Corruption Act in 2018. Since the alleged offences occurred before that, the amendment would not apply, and no such sanction is needed in this case.

The court accepted the government’s argument and allowed the trial to continue.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
More from Breaking
Jharkhand High Court designates 10 advocates as senior advocates

Jharkhand High Court designates 10 advocates as senior advocates

June 17, 2026
RSS demands probe into Ranchi office attack

RSS demands probe into Ranchi office attack

June 17, 2026
Jharkhand transfers 88 administrative service officers in major bureaucratic reshuffle

Jharkhand transfers 88 administrative service officers in major bureaucratic reshuffle

June 17, 2026

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.