Tata Steel Jamshedpur half marathon to go green, offers ₹9.18 lakh prize poolDPS Ranchi students explore Nainital, Jim Corbett on educational excursionIIT (ISM) Dhanbad alumnus appointed ONGC chairmanIIT (ISM) Dhanbad director selected for Legendary Teachers Award 2026Durga idol immersion passes off peacefully in Jamshedpur amid tight securityGovernor Gangwar highlights Jharkhand’s identity as the ‘Land of Archery’Governor inaugurates Swarnim Bharat Expo 2026 in Ranchi, emphasises youth empowermentJharkhand Weather: Morning fog to give way to clear skies, isolated rain possible on October 27

Supreme Court refuses to stay trial against Lalu Yadav in land-for-jobs case

THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK   Advertisement New Delhi, July 18: The Supreme Court has refused to stay the trial against former Bihar…

Supreme Court refuses to stay trial against Lalu Yadav in land-for-jobs case

THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK

 

Advertisement
Advertisement

New Delhi, July 18: The Supreme Court has refused to stay the trial against former Bihar Chief Minister Lalu Prasad Yadav in the land-for-jobs case.

A bench comprising Justices M.M. Sundresh and N. Kotiswar Singh declined to intervene after hearing a petition filed on behalf of Lalu Prasad.

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Also Read- ED arrests ex-Chhattisgarh CM’s son in liquor scam

Earlier, Lalu had approached the Delhi High Court seeking to halt the trial, but the request was denied. He then appealed to the Supreme Court against the High Court’s order.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal appeared for Lalu Prasad in the apex court and argued that the CBI had registered the FIR in 2021, even though Lalu served as a minister between 2005 and 2009.

Advertisement
Advertisement

He contended that under legal provisions, the trial cannot proceed without prior sanction from the competent authority, which, he claimed, was not obtained.

Also Read- Jharkhand sees surplus rainfall; heavy showers forecast for Ranchi region

However, Additional Solicitor General S.V. Raju, appearing for the government, argued that the requirement for prior sanction was introduced through amendments to the Prevention of Corruption Act in 2018. Since the alleged offences occurred before that, the amendment would not apply, and no such sanction is needed in this case.

The court accepted the government’s argument and allowed the trial to continue.

Advertisement
Advertisement
More from Breaking
Tata Steel Jamshedpur half marathon to go green, offers ₹9.18 lakh prize pool

Tata Steel Jamshedpur half marathon to go green, offers ₹9.18 lakh prize pool

October 22, 2026
DPS Ranchi students explore Nainital, Jim Corbett on educational excursion

DPS Ranchi students explore Nainital, Jim Corbett on educational excursion

October 22, 2026
IIT (ISM) Dhanbad alumnus appointed ONGC chairman

IIT (ISM) Dhanbad alumnus appointed ONGC chairman

October 22, 2026

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

About the Author

Suman Shrivastava