1. Simdega leads Jharkhand in AI training, officials learn how to make government work faster 2. Maoist surrenders trigger major search operation in Kuchai forests, arms recoveredSimdega leads Jharkhand in AI training, officials learn how to make government work fasterMaoist surrenders trigger major search operation in Kuchai forests, arms recoveredDeepika Pandey Singh inaugurates ‘Palash Didi Cafe’ at Raksha Shakti University campusBank strike disrupts services across Jamshedpur, KolhanPM Modi’s birthday to be celebrated as festival in Jharkhand, says BJP state chiefIIT-ISM Dhanbad’s Vishnu Teja tops SPE South Asia contest, advances to Houston global finalsIIT (ISM) Dhanbad’s Dr Shalu Rani joins Chemical Engineering Journal Editorial Board

Supreme Court refuses to stay trial against Lalu Yadav in land-for-jobs case

THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK   New Delhi, July 18: The Supreme Court has refused to stay the trial against former Bihar Chief…

Supreme Court refuses to stay trial against Lalu Yadav in land-for-jobs case

THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK

 

New Delhi, July 18: The Supreme Court has refused to stay the trial against former Bihar Chief Minister Lalu Prasad Yadav in the land-for-jobs case.

A bench comprising Justices M.M. Sundresh and N. Kotiswar Singh declined to intervene after hearing a petition filed on behalf of Lalu Prasad.

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Also Read- ED arrests ex-Chhattisgarh CM’s son in liquor scam

Earlier, Lalu had approached the Delhi High Court seeking to halt the trial, but the request was denied. He then appealed to the Supreme Court against the High Court’s order.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal appeared for Lalu Prasad in the apex court and argued that the CBI had registered the FIR in 2021, even though Lalu served as a minister between 2005 and 2009.

Advertisement
Advertisement

He contended that under legal provisions, the trial cannot proceed without prior sanction from the competent authority, which, he claimed, was not obtained.

Also Read- Jharkhand sees surplus rainfall; heavy showers forecast for Ranchi region

However, Additional Solicitor General S.V. Raju, appearing for the government, argued that the requirement for prior sanction was introduced through amendments to the Prevention of Corruption Act in 2018. Since the alleged offences occurred before that, the amendment would not apply, and no such sanction is needed in this case.

The court accepted the government’s argument and allowed the trial to continue.

Advertisement
Advertisement
More from Breaking
1. Simdega leads Jharkhand in AI training, officials learn how to make government work faster 2. Maoist surrenders trigger major search operation in Kuchai forests, arms recovered

1. Simdega leads Jharkhand in AI training, officials learn how to make government work faster 2. Maoist surrenders trigger major search operation in Kuchai forests, arms recovered

September 11, 2026
Simdega leads Jharkhand in AI training, officials learn how to make government work faster

Simdega leads Jharkhand in AI training, officials learn how to make government work faster

September 11, 2026
Maoist surrenders trigger major search operation in Kuchai forests, arms recovered

Maoist surrenders trigger major search operation in Kuchai forests, arms recovered

September 11, 2026

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

About the Author

Suman Shrivastava