Jharkhand HC refuses to penalise PIO in RTI case, directs litigant to pursue land dispute separatelyJharkhand HC reinstates revenue official, quashes compulsory retirement orderChhattisgarh Civil Society blames recruitment freeze for deepening health crisisDPS Ranchi student emerges as national topper with perfect 500/500 in CBSE SSCE 2025-26Loyola School, Telco honours merit, leadership and resilience at annual prize distribution ceremonyJamshedpur police foil extortion bid, arrest man in Bengal Club road firing caseYoga Day observed with enthusiasm at Sona Devi UniversityJharkhand: A nursery where ‘jungle jalebis’ are grown, hundreds of saplings ready for plantation

ED moves court over state’s inaction on Pooja Singhal prosecution sanction

THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK   Advertisement Ranchi, July 19: The Jharkhand government has not yet granted prosecution sanction against suspended bureaucrat Pooja…

ED moves court over state’s inaction on Pooja Singhal prosecution sanction

THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK

 

Advertisement
Advertisement

Ranchi, July 19: The Jharkhand government has not yet granted prosecution sanction against suspended bureaucrat Pooja Singhal in a money laundering case, prompting the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to move the court seeking “deemed sanction” to initiate trial.

The ED had formally sought approval from the state government nearly five months ago, as required under a Supreme Court ruling issued in November 2024.

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Also Read- SAD leader Majithia’s judicial custody extended in drug-linked asset case

The verdict made it mandatory to obtain prior government sanction before prosecuting public servants under money laundering charges. Before this ruling, no such approval was necessary.

Despite the legal requirement and the lapse of the 120-day deadline, the state government has not provided any response to the ED’s request.

As a result, the agency has now filed a petition before the trial court arguing that the government’s silence should be treated as an implied approval — or deemed sanction — for prosecution.

Also Read- 94.68% voter coverage achieved in Bihar’s electoral roll revision: ECI

In its petition, the ED has cited multiple directions issued by the Supreme Court in similar cases to support its claim.

The agency has urged the court to allow prosecution to proceed, arguing that indefinite silence by the state cannot be allowed to stall legal action in a case involving serious charges of money laundering.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
More from Breaking
Jharkhand HC refuses to penalise PIO in RTI case, directs litigant to pursue land dispute separately

Jharkhand HC refuses to penalise PIO in RTI case, directs litigant to pursue land dispute separately

June 22, 2026
Jharkhand HC reinstates revenue official, quashes compulsory retirement order

Jharkhand HC reinstates revenue official, quashes compulsory retirement order

June 22, 2026
Chhattisgarh Civil Society blames recruitment freeze for deepening health crisis

Chhattisgarh Civil Society blames recruitment freeze for deepening health crisis

June 22, 2026

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

About the Author

Suman Shrivastava