Jharkhand SIR: 83.51% enumeration forms digitised, says CEO K. Ravi Kumar; claims and objections phase begins1. JPSC-JSSC protest intensifies ahead of Monsoon session; government opens talks, BJP backs students 2.Jharkhand HC comes down hard on State’s ‘lethargic’ litigation; rejects 3 delayed appeals in a day and more storiesJharkhand HC comes down hard on State’s ‘lethargic’ litigation; rejects 3 delayed appeals in a dayIncab employees receive long-pending dues after verification; NCLAT defers hearing to November 5JPSC-JSSC protest intensifies ahead of Monsoon session; government opens talks, BJP backs studentsBabulal Marandi meets protesting students, demands CBI probe into JPSC-JSSC scamJharkhand HC dismisses Bank of Baroda appeal, upholds interest on refunded e-auction moneyIMD issues heavy rain alert for Kolhan today; thunderstorms, lightning likely across Jharkhand

ED moves court over state’s inaction on Pooja Singhal prosecution sanction

THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK   Advertisement Advertisement Ranchi, July 19: The Jharkhand government has not yet granted prosecution sanction against suspended bureaucrat…

ED moves court over state’s inaction on Pooja Singhal prosecution sanction

THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK

 

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Ranchi, July 19: The Jharkhand government has not yet granted prosecution sanction against suspended bureaucrat Pooja Singhal in a money laundering case, prompting the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to move the court seeking “deemed sanction” to initiate trial.

The ED had formally sought approval from the state government nearly five months ago, as required under a Supreme Court ruling issued in November 2024.

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Also Read- SAD leader Majithia’s judicial custody extended in drug-linked asset case

The verdict made it mandatory to obtain prior government sanction before prosecuting public servants under money laundering charges. Before this ruling, no such approval was necessary.

Despite the legal requirement and the lapse of the 120-day deadline, the state government has not provided any response to the ED’s request.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

As a result, the agency has now filed a petition before the trial court arguing that the government’s silence should be treated as an implied approval — or deemed sanction — for prosecution.

Also Read- 94.68% voter coverage achieved in Bihar’s electoral roll revision: ECI

In its petition, the ED has cited multiple directions issued by the Supreme Court in similar cases to support its claim.

The agency has urged the court to allow prosecution to proceed, arguing that indefinite silence by the state cannot be allowed to stall legal action in a case involving serious charges of money laundering.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
More from Breaking
Jharkhand SIR: 83.51% enumeration forms digitised, says CEO K. Ravi Kumar; claims and objections phase begins

Jharkhand SIR: 83.51% enumeration forms digitised, says CEO K. Ravi Kumar; claims and objections phase begins

August 5, 2026
1. JPSC-JSSC protest intensifies ahead of Monsoon session; government opens talks, BJP backs students 2.Jharkhand HC comes down hard on State’s ‘lethargic’ litigation; rejects 3 delayed appeals in a day and more stories

1. JPSC-JSSC protest intensifies ahead of Monsoon session; government opens talks, BJP backs students 2.Jharkhand HC comes down hard on State’s ‘lethargic’ litigation; rejects 3 delayed appeals in a day and more stories

August 5, 2026
Jharkhand HC comes down hard on State’s ‘lethargic’ litigation; rejects 3 delayed appeals in a day

Jharkhand HC comes down hard on State’s ‘lethargic’ litigation; rejects 3 delayed appeals in a day

August 5, 2026

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

About the Author

Suman Shrivastava