IIT (ISM) Dhanbad signs MoU with Urja Mobility for clean-tech researchLoyola School Telco students showcase confidence in choral dramatisation competitionबरी होने के बावजूद हिरासत में महिला: झारखंड HC ने पूछा- किस कानून के तहत रखा, गृह सचिव को तलब कियाAcquitted Yet Detained: Jharkhand HC questions woman’s continued custody, summons Home SecretaryKhunti DLSA holds legal, Aadhaar and medical camp for senior citizensMan dies after colliding with road roller in MahuadnarJharkhand DGP reviews Jamshedpur crime, directs swift arrests in bank robbery, firing casesWildlife Week 2026: Jamshedpur to host Nature Rally on October 2

Elon Musk’s X challenges Indian govt in Karnataka HC over censorship

THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK   Bengaluru, March 20: Elon Musk-owned social media company X (formerly Twitter) on Thursday filed a lawsuit against…

Elon Musk’s X challenges Indian govt in Karnataka HC over censorship

Image: Vartha Bharati

THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK

 

Bengaluru, March 20: Elon Musk-owned social media company X (formerly Twitter) on Thursday filed a lawsuit against the Government of India in the Karnataka High Court.

The lawsuit challenges the alleged “unlawful censorship” through the IT Act’s Section 79(3)(B) and the Cooperation Portal.

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

X Corp claims that the Indian government is misusing these provisions to create a parallel and unregulated censorship mechanism, bypassing statutory safeguards. The next hearing in the case is scheduled for March 27, 2025.

X Alleges Misuse of IT Act Provisions

In its petition, X has argued that the Indian government is misusing Section 79(3)(B) of the IT Act. This provision allows intermediaries to be directed to remove or disable access to illegal content, but only by following a clear legal procedure.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Also Read- Jharkhand News: Nilamber Pitamber University in acute faculty crisis; hundreds of posts vacant

X claims that the government is issuing takedown orders through the Cooperation Portal without adhering to the procedures outlined under Section 69A.

The Supreme Court, in the Shreya Singhal vs. Union of India (2015) case, recognized Section 69A as the only legitimate legal framework for blocking online content.

X alleges that by using the Cooperation Portal, the government is bypassing transparency and accountability while ordering content removal, which amounts to a violation of freedom of expression.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Govt’s Response

In the first hearing, the Indian government stated that no action has been taken so far against X for refusing to join the Cooperation Portal. The government has also sought clarification from X regarding the responses of its AI chatbot, Grok, adding a new dimension to the case.

However, the government has yet to provide a detailed response to the lawsuit.

The court granted interim relief to X, allowing it to approach the court again if the government takes any strict action.

Also Read- Jharkhand News: DGRC to review disputed Ayushman Bharat bills of private hospitals

More from Breaking
IIT (ISM) Dhanbad signs MoU with Urja Mobility for clean-tech research

IIT (ISM) Dhanbad signs MoU with Urja Mobility for clean-tech research

October 1, 2026
Loyola School Telco students showcase confidence in choral dramatisation competition

Loyola School Telco students showcase confidence in choral dramatisation competition

October 1, 2026
बरी होने के बावजूद हिरासत में महिला: झारखंड HC ने पूछा- किस कानून के तहत रखा, गृह सचिव को तलब किया

बरी होने के बावजूद हिरासत में महिला: झारखंड HC ने पूछा- किस कानून के तहत रखा, गृह सचिव को तलब किया

October 1, 2026

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

About the Author

Suman Shrivastava