No ‘out-of-turn’ VIP or VVIP darshan during Shravani Mela, says minister Sudivya KumarNilamber Pitamber University gives two colleges until July 30 to restore science faculty affiliationDharmendra Pradhan resigns as Union Education Minister amid NEET protest row, student agitationJharkhand Weather: Active monsoon to bring heavy rain till July 30; rainfall deficit narrows to 27%From Kumirmudi to national glory: Ravi Raj Murmu’s journey inspires a new generation of tribal storytellers1. Jharkhand HC sends strong message on marriage, rejects four divorce appeals in one day 2. CM Hemant Soren orders crackdown on illegal liquor trade, fast-tracks excise recruitment in Jharkhand and more storiesSona Devi University vice-chancellor receives education excellence awardJharkhand launches ‘Vidhi Portal 2.0’ to digitally transform government litigation management

No approval needed for probe: Jharkhand Govt tells SC in Deoghar airport case

THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK   Advertisement New Delhi, Nov 27: The Supreme Court heard the Jharkhand government’s petition on Wednesday challenging the…

No approval needed for probe: Jharkhand Govt tells SC in Deoghar airport case

THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK

 

Advertisement
Advertisement

New Delhi, Nov 27: The Supreme Court heard the Jharkhand government’s petition on Wednesday challenging the Jharkhand High Court’s decision to quash the FIR against BJP MPs Nishikant Dubey, Manoj Tiwari, and others in the Deoghar airport case.

A bench of Justice Abhay Oka and Justice Augustine George Masih asked the state to present arguments supporting its position that an investigation could continue without prior approval. The Jharkhand High Court had dismissed the FIR on the grounds that no prior approval was obtained as required under the Aircraft (Amendment) Act, 2020.

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Also Read- Lok Sabha, Rajya Sabha adjourned for the day

During the hearing, the state government’s lawyer argued that the question of approval would not arise at the investigation stage but only when a complaint is registered and the court takes cognizance of it. Therefore, the restriction would apply not during the investigation but after the filing of charges and completion of the investigation.

The court then sought a decision to support this argument. Justice Oka noted that in similar cases, there are rulings that allow investigations before taking cognizance and the use of material for registering a complaint. The Supreme Court will hear the case again on December 18.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Also Read- Jharkhand Weather: No significant changes in min. temp. in next 48 hours 

More from Breaking
No ‘out-of-turn’ VIP or VVIP darshan during Shravani Mela, says minister Sudivya Kumar

No ‘out-of-turn’ VIP or VVIP darshan during Shravani Mela, says minister Sudivya Kumar

July 25, 2026
Nilamber Pitamber University gives two colleges until July 30 to restore science faculty affiliation

Nilamber Pitamber University gives two colleges until July 30 to restore science faculty affiliation

July 25, 2026
Dharmendra Pradhan resigns as Union Education Minister amid NEET protest row, student agitation

Dharmendra Pradhan resigns as Union Education Minister amid NEET protest row, student agitation

July 25, 2026

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

About the Author

Suman Shrivastava