Naman pays tribute to Param Vir Chakra awardee Shaheed Abdul HamidFresh low-pressure area to bring heavy rain to Jharkhand over next two daysSarvdalya Manch takes out rally against alleged SIR excesses in Mahuadnr1. Jharkhand HC backs online land mutation applications, says digital filing cannot be restricted 2. Supreme Court approves appointment of three Judicial Officers as Jharkhand HC judgesUMU: India’s ‘salad culture’ reflects its pluralistic character, says Tourism SecretaryBreaking: Supreme Court Collegium approves appointment of three Judicial Officers as Jharkhand HC judgesJharkhand HC backs online land mutation applications, says digital filing cannot be restrictedThree Maoists, including two carrying ₹25 lakh combined reward, surrender in Jharkhand

SC stays Allahabad HC’s ruling on definition of rape

THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK   New Delhi, March 26: The Supreme Court on Wednesday stayed certain observations made by the Allahabad High…

SC stays Allahabad HC’s ruling on definition of rape

THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK

 

New Delhi, March 26: The Supreme Court on Wednesday stayed certain observations made by the Allahabad High Court in a March 17 order, which stated that grabbing a woman’s breast and pulling the string of her pyjama do not constitute rape.

Taking suo motu cognisance of the order, the apex court found some of the remarks to be extremely insensitive and lacking a humane perspective.

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

A bench comprising Justices B R Gavai and Augustine George Masih expressed deep concern over the language used in the high court’s ruling, emphasizing that it reflected a troubling insensitivity.

Also Read- Clear sky, dry weather in Jharkhand for next 72 hours

The court has sought responses from the Centre, the Uttar Pradesh government, and other concerned parties regarding the matter.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Allahabad High Court’s decision was issued in response to a revision petition filed by two individuals challenging a special judge’s order in Kasganj, which had summoned them under Section 376 (rape) of the Indian Penal Code, along with other charges.

While the High Court ruled that the alleged acts did not amount to rape, it categorized them under offenses related to assault or the use of criminal force with intent to disrobe or compel a woman to be naked.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Also Read- CBI raids residences of Bhupesh Baghel in Mahadev betting app case

More from Breaking
Naman pays tribute to Param Vir Chakra awardee Shaheed Abdul Hamid

Naman pays tribute to Param Vir Chakra awardee Shaheed Abdul Hamid

September 11, 2026
Fresh low-pressure area to bring heavy rain to Jharkhand over next two days

Fresh low-pressure area to bring heavy rain to Jharkhand over next two days

September 11, 2026
Sarvdalya Manch takes out rally against alleged SIR excesses in Mahuadnr

Sarvdalya Manch takes out rally against alleged SIR excesses in Mahuadnr

September 11, 2026

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

About the Author

Suman Shrivastava