Palamu dacoity: Gang flees with jewellery worth ₹8–10 lakh and a tin of khainiFood safety team tests frying oil at Daltonganj eateries, finds high TPM in samosa shopSona Devi University Marks World Mental Health Day, stresses student well-beingFirst inter-college sports fest concludes at JRD Sports Complex with 400-plus participantsMorning fog, mist to persist as Jharkhand braces for isolated showersAEM, OMQ and TSJ Ops clinch basketball, volleyball titles at JRD sports complexLady Meherbai Tata and the Jubilee Diamond: A legacy of sacrifice and philanthropyJharkhand braces for Monsoon exit as withdrawal advances

Supreme Court rebukes Tamil Nadu Governor for inaction on bills

THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK   New Delhi, April 8: The Supreme Court on Tuesday strongly criticized Tamil Nadu Governor R N Ravi,…

Supreme Court rebukes Tamil Nadu Governor for inaction on bills

File photo of Tamil Nadu Governor R N Ravi

THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK

 

New Delhi, April 8: The Supreme Court on Tuesday strongly criticized Tamil Nadu Governor R N Ravi, ruling that his decision to reserve 10 Bills for the President’s consideration violated constitutional norms.

A bench comprising Justices J B Pardiwala and R Mahadevan emphasized that under Article 200 of the Constitution, the governor is bound to act based on the aid and advice of the council of ministers, leaving no room for personal discretion.

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Clarifying the governor’s constitutional duties, the bench stated that once a Bill is re-submitted to him after initial consideration, he must give his assent unless the Bill has undergone material changes.

The court firmly ruled that the governor cannot indefinitely withhold assent, exercise an absolute veto, or employ a pocket veto.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Also Read- New police outpost planned near Deoghar airport; Padma OP upgraded

The bench stated that the Governor is required to act within three months by either approving a Bill, sending it back to the legislature, or forwarding it to the President for consideration.

The judges stressed that the governor’s choices under Article 200 are limited — he can either grant assent, withhold assent, or reserve the Bill for the President’s consideration.

However, they pointed out that it is unconstitutional for the governor to reserve a Bill for the President once it is placed before him a second time.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Article 200, which governs the governor’s powers regarding assent to Bills, does not empower him to delay or block legislative processes at his discretion, the bench observed.

More from Breaking
Palamu dacoity: Gang flees with jewellery worth ₹8–10 lakh and a tin of khaini

Palamu dacoity: Gang flees with jewellery worth ₹8–10 lakh and a tin of khaini

October 12, 2026
Food safety team tests frying oil at Daltonganj eateries, finds high TPM in samosa shop

Food safety team tests frying oil at Daltonganj eateries, finds high TPM in samosa shop

October 12, 2026
Sona Devi University Marks World Mental Health Day, stresses student well-being

Sona Devi University Marks World Mental Health Day, stresses student well-being

October 12, 2026

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

About the Author

Suman Shrivastava