THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK
Ranchi, June 30: The Sido-Kanhu Hul Foundation had sought official permission to commemorate Hul Diwas in Bhognadih, Sahibganj district, but the district administration rejected the request. Undeterred, the foundation proceeded to erect a pandal (temporary ceremonial structure), prompting administrative concerns about potential security risks. In the early hours, several individuals were detained, igniting tensions among the local tribal community.
Demonstration Escalates as Crowd Faces Force
In response to perceived repression, villagers—led by Mandal Murmu, a descendant of the historic Hul leaders Sido and Kanhu—locked a park and staged a protest, brandishing traditional tribal weapons. Authorities responded with a lathicharge and deployed tear gas shells to disperse the thousands-strong crowd. More than a dozen people, including three policemen, were reported injured. All those hurts are currently receiving treatment at the Barhet Community Health Centre (CHC).
Also Read: Ashu Gopal crowned Ranchi U-19 badminton champion
Why the Clash Occurred
At its core, the confrontation stemmed from a clash between the community’s desire to honour a keystone moment in tribal resistance history and the administration’s decision to deny permission over security concerns. With Hul Diwas being a deeply symbolic event for the Adivasi population—commemorating the 19th‑century Sido‑Kanhu rebellion against colonial rule—the denial was seen as an affront to cultural pride and identity. When villagers pressed ahead despite official orders and erected a pandal, authorities responded forcefully, leading to the escalation.
Political Outcry Over Police Action
The lathicharge on a tribal gathering drew sharp criticism. Former Jharkhand Chief Minister Champai Soren was expected to attend as the event’s chief guest, further heightening tensions following the administration’s intervention. Leader of Opposition Babulal Marandi condemned the police action as “barbaric,” asserting it revived “memories of British rule” and accusing the state government of undermining tribal heritage and rights. He predicted the incident might backfire politically on the Hemant Soren-led administration.
