5 years on, Jharkhand ex-Governor Droupadi Murmu’s fiat to Speaker to act in Assembly job scam remains stuck
THE JHARKHAND STORY NETWORK Advertisement Ranchi, Oct 12: The Jharkhand High Court today granted one more opportunity to the Assembly secretary…
THE JHARKHAND STORY NETWORK
Ranchi, Oct 12: The Jharkhand High Court today granted one more opportunity to the Assembly secretary to produce the report of Justice Vikramaditya Prasad Commission, submitted to the then Governor (Now President) Droupadi Murmu in 2018.
The Commission, constituted by the State government, had probed largescale bungling into the appointment of over 500 employees between 2005 and 2007.
A division bench comprising Chief Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra and Justice Ananda Sen, while hearing a PIL filed demanding an investigation into illegal appointments, fixed November 9 for the next hearing after lawyer Anil Kumar, appearing for the Assembly secretary, informed the court that a letter had been written to the Justice SJ Mukhopadhyay Commission seeking the report of the Justice Vikramaditya Commission.
The counsel assured that the report will be presented before the court after receiving it from the Commission.
Notably, Shiv Shankar Sharma has filed a PIL in the High Court demanding an investigation into illegal appointments in the Jharkhand Assembly and act on the recommendation of the then Governor Droupadi Murmu, sent to the then Speaker Dinesh Oraon on September 10, 2018.
The court, during its hearing on October 4, had warned the Assembly secretary to face criminal contempt proceedings if he did not submit the report by October 12.
The court had even observed that “the report is deliberately not produced before us even though Her Excellency the then Governor of the State has directed the Speaker of Vidhan Sabha to carry out the proposals given in the report. So, we consider it to be an obstruction to justice.”
Incidentally, the Assembly has not submitted the report saying that the report of Justice Vikramaditya Prasad Commission is currently with the Commission headed by Justice SJ Mukhopadhyay, a retired Supreme Court judge. The court had sought the report at least four times in the past.
Notably, the State government had constituted Justice Mukhopadhyay Commission with a mandate to examine the legal issues that may crop up if the Assembly acts on the report of the late Vikramaditya Prasad Commission, which is said to have made adverse comments on the role of three successive speakers and several assembly officers.
So, the assembly’s reluctance to submit the report, whose copy is easily available to several persons in Jharkhand, is not without reason.
The Assembly compulsorily retired two joint secretaries-Ram Sagar and Ravindra Singh-in 2018 after the commission report came. The reason given for action against them was that they were involved in a conspiracy for illegal appointments. But it did not take further action.
According to sources, the process of all these appointments was initiated during the tenure of Inder Singh Namdhari and completed when Alamgir Alam was the speaker. Alam’s successor Satyanand Bhokta gave out-of-turn promotions to several such employees.
Notably, the then-governor, in her letter to the Speaker, had clearly written that the Justice Vikramaditya commission had given a detailed report on 30 reference points with its recommendation for action. “The Commission had clearly mentioned the names of officers and employees who were accountable for the bungling in appointments,” she pointed out in her letter.
She also pointed out that the commission recommended a CBI probe into the CD consisting of financial transactions for the jobs. The CD surfaced during the tenure of Alamgir Alam, who is at present rural development minister in Jharkhand.
