Tatanagar station redevelopment gets fresh push, advisory panel reviews passenger facilitiesJharkhand: Expired salt meant for poor found dumped in Seraikela warehouseJharkhand HC imposes ₹12 lakh cost on litigant for suppressing material facts in Ranchi land casePolice detain three Ranchi residents during raid at Jamshedpur hotelJharkhand to get relief from heavy rain as depression weakensJharkhand: Nilgai menace on Palamu roads raises safety concerns; motorists urged to stay alertPalamu police crackdown on drug smugglers, seize 35 kg+ narcotics in Operation PraharRailway welfare body demands permanent RPF outpost at Tatanagar yard after engineer attack

Supreme Court refuses to stay trial against Lalu Yadav in land-for-jobs case

THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK   Advertisement New Delhi, July 18: The Supreme Court has refused to stay the trial against former Bihar…

Supreme Court refuses to stay trial against Lalu Yadav in land-for-jobs case

THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK

 

Advertisement
Advertisement

New Delhi, July 18: The Supreme Court has refused to stay the trial against former Bihar Chief Minister Lalu Prasad Yadav in the land-for-jobs case.

A bench comprising Justices M.M. Sundresh and N. Kotiswar Singh declined to intervene after hearing a petition filed on behalf of Lalu Prasad.

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Also Read- ED arrests ex-Chhattisgarh CM’s son in liquor scam

Earlier, Lalu had approached the Delhi High Court seeking to halt the trial, but the request was denied. He then appealed to the Supreme Court against the High Court’s order.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal appeared for Lalu Prasad in the apex court and argued that the CBI had registered the FIR in 2021, even though Lalu served as a minister between 2005 and 2009.

Advertisement
Advertisement

He contended that under legal provisions, the trial cannot proceed without prior sanction from the competent authority, which, he claimed, was not obtained.

Also Read- Jharkhand sees surplus rainfall; heavy showers forecast for Ranchi region

However, Additional Solicitor General S.V. Raju, appearing for the government, argued that the requirement for prior sanction was introduced through amendments to the Prevention of Corruption Act in 2018. Since the alleged offences occurred before that, the amendment would not apply, and no such sanction is needed in this case.

The court accepted the government’s argument and allowed the trial to continue.

Advertisement
Advertisement
More from Breaking
Tatanagar station redevelopment gets fresh push, advisory panel reviews passenger facilities

Tatanagar station redevelopment gets fresh push, advisory panel reviews passenger facilities

July 31, 2026
Jharkhand: Expired salt meant for poor found dumped in Seraikela warehouse

Jharkhand: Expired salt meant for poor found dumped in Seraikela warehouse

July 31, 2026
Jharkhand HC imposes ₹12 lakh cost on litigant for suppressing material facts in Ranchi land case

Jharkhand HC imposes ₹12 lakh cost on litigant for suppressing material facts in Ranchi land case

July 31, 2026

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

About the Author

Suman Shrivastava