‘Why are lizards an overlooked creature in wildlife week celebrations?’ asks DFO MedininagarCBSE nominates C.B. Sinha as member of inspection committeeGandhi’s philosophy of non-violence offers a roadmap to global peaceHemant Soren congratulates Jharkhand’s Asian Games gold medal-winning hockey playersThree held in Baradwari firing case, two pistols and cartridges recoveredPalamu police intensify anti-crime checking across districtBus overturns on NH-33 in Seraikela, three seriously injuredJHALSA moves to support Junior Asia Hockey Cup Gold Medallists, DLSA teams visit homes

Bombay HC halts ACB action on FIR against ex-SEBI head till March 4

THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK   Mumbai, March 3: The Bombay High Court today directed the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) not to take any…

Bombay HC halts ACB action on FIR against ex-SEBI head till March 4

THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK

 

Mumbai, March 3: The Bombay High Court today directed the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) not to take any action until March 4 on an order instructing the agency to file an FIR against former SEBI chairperson Madhabi Puri Buch and five others, including Bombay Stock Exchange MD Sundararaman Ramamurthy, for alleged stock market fraud and regulatory violations.

The Bombay High Court’s single-judge bench of Justice S.G. Dige heard the urgent pleas and scheduled a hearing for the matter on Tuesday, March 4, 2025, directing the ACB to hold off on any action until then.

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Also Read- IMA blames Hemant Soren, Raghubar Das for Jharkhand’s ailing health services

The petitioners, including Buch, Ramamurthy, and other SEBI officials, filed a petition seeking to quash the March 1 order passed by a special court in Mumbai, which directed the ACB to register a case related to alleged fraud committed in 1994 while listing a company on the BSE.

The special court had instructed the ACB to submit a status report within 30 days of the investigation.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Represented by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, the petitioners argued that the order was illegal and arbitrary. They contended that the special court’s order was based on prima facie evidence of regulatory lapses and collusion and required further scrutiny. Senior advocate Amit Desai also appeared for Ramamurthy and Pramod Agarwal, a former public interest director at BSE.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Also Read- PM Modi marks World Wildlife Day with lion safari at Gir National Park

More from Breaking
‘Why are lizards an overlooked creature in wildlife week celebrations?’ asks DFO Medininagar

‘Why are lizards an overlooked creature in wildlife week celebrations?’ asks DFO Medininagar

October 4, 2026
CBSE nominates C.B. Sinha as member of inspection committee

CBSE nominates C.B. Sinha as member of inspection committee

October 4, 2026
Gandhi’s philosophy of non-violence offers a roadmap to global peace

Gandhi’s philosophy of non-violence offers a roadmap to global peace

October 4, 2026

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

About the Author

Suman Shrivastava