South Eastern Railway Sets Record, Scrap Sales Cross ₹400 CroreIIT (ISM) Dhanbad’s digital education programme reaches over 3,000 tribal studentsTwo spectacled cobras found in irrigation well in PalamuTata Steel’s Jharia mines earn coveted five-star ratingsLight rain to give way to winter chill in JharkhandJamshedpur software engineer among three killed in Gokarna beach drowningDoctor shot at in Adityapur, critical; brother suspectedThree arrested in Jamshedpur cybercrime case, including Jio employee

Supreme Court rules calling someone ‘Miyan’ or ‘Pakistani’ wrong, but not crime

THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK   Advertisement New Delhi, March 4: Referring to a person as “Miyan-Tiyan” or “Pakistani” is inappropriate, but it…

Supreme Court rules calling someone ‘Miyan’ or ‘Pakistani’ wrong, but not crime

THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK

 

Advertisement
Advertisement

New Delhi, March 4: Referring to a person as “Miyan-Tiyan” or “Pakistani” is inappropriate, but it does not constitute a criminal offense. This observation was made by Supreme Court’s Justice B.V. Nagarathana and Justice Satish Chandra Sharma’s bench while hearing an appeal against a ruling by the Jharkhand High Court. The bench overturned the High Court’s decision and acquitted the appellant (accused).

The court stated that the appellant was accused of hurting the complainant’s religious sentiments by referring to them as ‘Miyan’ and ‘Pakistani.’ Undoubtedly, this statement is inappropriate; however, it does not equate to intentionally hurting the religious sentiments of the complainant.

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

The court, while rejecting the Jharkhand High Court’s order, acquitted the accused under Section 298 of the Indian Penal Code in this case.

Also Read- Jharkhand News: Dhanbad Railway Division earns over Rs 3.65 crores from Kumbh special trains

“Further, the appellant is accused of hurting the religious feelings of the informant by calling him ‘Miyan-Tiyan’ and ‘Pakistani.” Undoubtedly, the statements made are in poor taste. However, it does not amount to hurting the religious sentiments of the informant”, the Court said in its judgement.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The case involves the acting clerk and Urdu translator of the Chas Sub-Divisional Office in Jharkhand, who had filed an FIR. The complainant alleged that when he went to seek information regarding an RTI application, the accused misbehaved with him, citing his religion.

When the matter reached the Jharkhand High Court, the court considered it a serious offense and refused to acquit the accused. The accused then challenged the High Court’s order in the Supreme Court, where the bench of Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Justice Satish Chandra Sharma heard the case.

Also Read- IIT ISM Dhanbad launches cutting-edge course with global expert

Advertisement
Advertisement
More from Breaking
South Eastern Railway Sets Record, Scrap Sales Cross ₹400 Crore

South Eastern Railway Sets Record, Scrap Sales Cross ₹400 Crore

November 3, 2026
IIT (ISM) Dhanbad’s digital education programme reaches over 3,000 tribal students

IIT (ISM) Dhanbad’s digital education programme reaches over 3,000 tribal students

November 3, 2026
Two spectacled cobras found in irrigation well in Palamu

Two spectacled cobras found in irrigation well in Palamu

November 3, 2026

Stay informed. Get Jharkhand's top stories in your inbox.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

About the Author

Suman Shrivastava