THE JHARKHAND STORY DESK
New Delhi, March 28: Over 600 lawyers have penned a letter to Chief Justice of India (CJI) Justice Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, raising significant concerns about the activities of a particular interest group seeking to erode the integrity of the judiciary.
The letter bears the signatures of notable lawyers including senior advocate Harish Salve, Manan Kumar Mishra, Adish Aggarwala, Chetan Mittal, Pinky Anand, Hitesh Jain, Ujjwala Pawar, Uday Holla, and Swaroopama Chaturvedi.
Additionally, Manan Kumar Mishra, Chairman of the Bar Council of India, and Adish Aggarwala, President of the Supreme Court Bar Association, have also signed and lent their support.
Lawyers accuse group of influencing court decisions, undermining democracy
The lawyers claim that this group is using pressure to sway court decisions, especially in situations involving political leaders and accusations of corruption. They contend that these acts seriously jeopardize the foundation of democracy and public confidence in the legal system.
Also Read- UGC simplifies PhD admissions process, NET scores to replace university entrance exams
The attorneys outlined a number of worrisome tactics, such as the spread of untrue stories about a supposed “golden era” of the judiciary, which are intended to undermine public trust in the legal system and discredit present legal procedures.
Lawyers raise concerns over manipulation of courts and politicization of judicial process
The allegations encompass accusations of ‘bench fixing’, disrespectful likening of domestic courts to those in lawless regimes, and direct assaults on the honour of judges.
The letter said that the interest group was using a “My way or the highway” stance in its tactics, selectively criticizing or praising court rulings in order to further its political goals.
There are also concerns raised about political flip-flopping, wherein politicians oscillate between accusing individuals of corruption and defending them in court.
The letter also underscored the utilization of covert strategies and spreading of misinformation to sway judicial appointments and decisions.
Drawing comparisons to similar actions in 2018-2019, the attorneys observe that these tactics are strategically timed around election times.
